ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Change in influenza vaccine uptake among adults in the United States from May 2020 to October 2024.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and immunogenicity of a COVID-19-Influenza Combination nanoparticle vaccine (CIC) containing SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike and quadrivalent influenza hemagglutinin with Matrix-M® adjuvant: A phase 1/2 clinical trial.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of an on-site vaccination campaign for patients with cancer.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of Influenza Vaccine Uptake Among Rural Populations in a Southeastern U.S. State.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Article
- Editorial: Dormant Cancer Cells, Cancer Progression, and Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 and Influenza.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- National expert consensus recommendations on influenza vaccination in Saudi Arabia (2025).Journal of family & community medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Influenza vaccines are essential against the spread of influenza virus. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends vaccination to all eligible individuals over 6 months of age; however, uptake remains suboptimal nationally. We do not fully understand the current nuances of influenza vaccine uptake, nor how it has been affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. From 2020-2024, we conducted two distinct, cross-sectional surveys assessing influenza vaccine uptake among US adults. A census-matched national sample was recruited by online survey company CloudResearch, and respondents were asked whether they had or planned to receive the influenza vaccine. Analyses were stratified by demographic and weighted according to age, sex, and race estimates from the American Community Survey (ACS) 2022. We found that overall uptake decreased, with significant declines among demographic groups usually associated with higher vaccine uptake. Compared to 2022, individuals who were older (11% decrease), male (13%), White (7%), non-Hispanic (5%), or more educated (16%) were significantly less likely to receive the influenza vaccine in 2024. Changes in attitudes and intentions towards vaccination during and since the COVID-19 pandemic have been associated with several factors, including changes in perceived risk and the rise of vaccine-related mis- and disinformation. Targeted behavioral interventions can be used to shift attitudes, intentions, and eventually, behaviors, towards health-seeking behaviors like vaccination. We must target these demographics with evidence-based behavioral interventions to improve uptake of influenza vaccination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.