SynthesisJMIR medical education2025
Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- User Acceptance of an AI-Powered Medical History-Taking Training System Among Undergraduate Medical Students: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- e-Learning, Distance Education, and Virtual and Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Training: European Cross-Sectional Survey of Trainee Acceptance Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Medication-Related Errors Among Nurses by Unit Adaptation Levels: Bayesian Network-Based Exploratory Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing and associated factors: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Acceptance and use of GenAI among medical and health sciences students in Saudi Arabia: an extended TAM study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- An Experimental Study on the Effectiveness and Usefulness of 360° Virtual Reality Simulation in Korean Medical Education: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Medical Students' Acceptance of Digital Entrustable Professional Activities: Results of a Cohort Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Adoption of generative AI chatbots among medical postgraduates at two universities in China: patterns, attitudes, and concerns.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- ICU nurses' experiences with virtual reality technology for work-related stress reduction: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- An integrated cognitive load-technology acceptance model for explaining behavioral intention to adopt Smart Physical Education Systems for extracurricular physical activity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Reading Pen-Based, Audio-Assisted Health Education Tool for Postoperative Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Care in Older Adults.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Experience of older adults using smart devices and mHealth apps for proactive health: a descriptive qualitative study based on the technology acceptance model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Medical Education in LMICs: A Narrative Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Trusting and staying with AI doctors: cognitive and emotional pathways driving continuance intention toward AI healthcare chatbots.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of IIIDDS: a structured WhatsApp case-discussion curriculum in undergraduate radiology education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding digital transformation in health professions education: a comparative analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and readiness among faculty and students at KSAU-HS.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI literacy and creative self-beliefs among Chinese college students: examining the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Implementing low-cost 3D-printed brain coloring activities in neuroanatomy teaching for medical students in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026Article
- A narrative discussion on the impact of respiratory infectious diseases on dental education in China: implications for curriculum design and student outcomes.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- From classroom to screen: dental students' perceptions of distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in India.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the growing use of technology in medical education, a framework is needed to evaluate learners' and educators' acceptance of these technologies. In this context, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) offers a valuable theoretical framework, providing insights into the determinants influencing users' acceptance and adoption of technology. Objective: This review aims to systematically synthesize the body of research in medical education that uses the TAM. Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) approach in February 2024 on the Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, yielding 680 articles. Upon elimination of duplicates and applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 39 articles were retained. To evaluate the quality of the study, the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score was calculated for each analysis with a qualitative component. Results: Studies using TAM in medical education began in 2010, with the model's application relatively rare up to 2016. Most of the studies were quantitative, operationalizing the TAM as a survey instrument, but it was also used as a research framework in qualitative data analysis. Structural equation modeling, descriptive analysis, and correlation analysis were the most common data analysis approaches in the studies. E-learning and mobile learning were the predominant learning interventions explored, but there were indications that novel learning technologies such as augmented reality, virtual reality, and 3D printing were being investigated. Conclusions: The study's findings reveal an expanding scholarly engagement with using TAM in medical education. Although the TAM has been mostly used as a survey instrument, it can also be adapted as a qualitative research framework to analyze data. This systematic review provides a foundation for future research to understand the factors influencing users' acceptance of technology, especially in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.