Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668662›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2025

Estimating efficacy of favezelimab plus pembrolizumab relative to pembrolizumab in anti-PD-1-refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

Philippe Armand, Pier Luigi Zinzani, John Timmerman, Nathalie A Johnson, David Lavie, Kannan Thiagarajan, Brian G Topp, Pallavi Pillai, Alex F Herrera

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02453594 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Clinical Trial of MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2023Enrolled211ConditionsHodgkin LymphomaArmspembrolizumab
NCT03598608 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase 1/Phase 2 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Combination of MK-4280 and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With Hematologic Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2018 to 2026Enrolled137ConditionsHodgkin Disease, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, B-CellArmspembrolizumab, Favezelimab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philippe ArmandDivision of Lymphoma, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Pier Luigi ZinzaniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Seràgnoli Istituto di Ematologia, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-2651
John TimmermanDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Nathalie A JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada.
David LavieDepartment of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Kannan ThiagarajanMedical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ.
Brian G ToppMedical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ.
Pallavi PillaiMedical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ.
Alex F HerreraDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9665-7415

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractFavezelimab plus pembrolizumab had promising efficacy in anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in MK-4280-003; however, the contribution of favezelimab was unclear. Here, we assessed the relative contribution of favezelimab by comparison with data from participants treated with only pembrolizumab beyond progression in KEYNOTE-087. Participants in MK-4280-003 had received ≥2 doses of anti-PD-1 therapy and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants eligible from KEYNOTE-087 had received >2 doses of pembrolizumab beyond progression, and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus favezelimab 200 mg or 800 mg, or pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks. Change in target lesion size and response per International Working Group 2007 criteria were assessed. Baseline tumor size was reset at first progression for KEYNOTE-087. A bootstrapping method compared change in target lesion size between groups. Twenty-seven participants from MK-4280-003 and 81 from KEYNOTE-087 were included. Objective response rates were 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-51) for favezelimab plus pembrolizumab, and 2% (95% CI, 0-6) for pembrolizumab alone. A clinically meaningful reduction (≥50%) in target lesion size was observed in 13 (48%) vs 4 participants (5%), respectively. The mean change from baseline in target lesion size was -49% and -0.4%. In the bootstrapping analysis, 99.4% of samples showed greater decrease in tumor burden with favezelimab plus pembrolizumab. Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had a higher response rate and greater reduction in tumor burden vs pembrolizumab alone in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma, suggesting favezelimab contributed substantially to efficacy in MK-4280-003. The trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03598608 and #NCT02453594.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHodgkin DiseaseAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanpembrolizumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID40668662
PMCPMC12514497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.