ArticleBlood advances2025
Older matched sibling donor vs young haploidentical donor for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with AML and MDS: navigating risks and optimizing outcomes.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- Genome Agnostic Reprogramming of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia Hallmarks by Targeting Non-Oncogene Addictions with Azacitidine Plus Pioglitazone and All-Trans Retinoic Acid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Superior outcomes with offspring B-leader-matched haploidentical versus older matched sibling donors in AL/MDS patients aged ≥40 years.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Embarrassment of riches: which donor for allo-transplant?Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractSelection of a suitable donor for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has mainly relied on HLA matching and, to date, a matched sibling donor (MSD) remains the first choice. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are older and therefore tend to have older siblings. Haploidentical donors (HIDs) are easily available, and offspring are younger than siblings. As donor age has been associated with worse outcomes, a younger HID might be a better choice than an older MSD for older patients with AML who receive transplantation in first complete remission (CR1). From the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry database, we selected patients with AML aged ≥60 years who received transplantation in CR1, either from MSD aged ≥50 years or HID ≤40 years. HIDs received posttransplant cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and MSDs received in vivo T-cell depletion. A total of 1247 patients were identified, including 721 MSDs and 526 HIDs. In univariate analysis, HID was associated with lower relapse incidence (P = .01), higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM; P = .01). The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 62.5%, 56%, and 47%, respectively for the all population. In multivariate analysis, we confirmed that HID was associated with less relapse but more NRM, which translated into similar OS, LFS, and GRFS. Based on this retrospective study, young HIDs led to less relapse but higher NRM than older MSDs after allo-HCT in an older population with AML in CR1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.