ArticleBlood advances2025
Population-based validation of the CAR-HEMATOTOX for hematotoxicity, infections, and survival after CART in R/R LBCL.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CAR-HEMATOTOX score as a predictor of hematotoxicity, infection, and survival after CAR T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive Models for Toxicities after CAR T-cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.Blood cancer discovery · 2026Review
- Article
- Risk of thrombosis and bleeding following CAR T-cell therapy: Insights from the Dutch "Follow that CAR!" registry.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Management of hematological toxicities after BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Editorial: Novel therapies and unexpected challenges: overcoming immune-mediated toxicities in modern oncology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The CAR-HEMATOTOX: ready for prime time.Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEarly identification of patients at risk of immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) is essential to minimize nonrelapse mortality. The CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score is an implemented risk-stratification tool for ICAHT, infections, and survival in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART). Although validated in its defining study, the HT score was developed in a small cohort, necessitating independent external validation. This study externally validates the HT score in a real-world population-based cohort of adults with R/R LBCL receiving CART. The HT score, based on absolute neutrophil count (ANC), hemoglobin, platelets, C-reactive protein, and ferritin, was calculated before lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Of 245 consecutive patients, 171 (70%) had an HT score of ≥2 (HThigh). The initial end point, clinically significant neutropenia (ANC of <500/μL for ≥14 days), occurred in 21% of patients. The binary HT score was associated with clinically significant neutropenia (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-6.80; P = .012) with a good predictive performance (area under the curve = 0.73). Similar results were achieved for early and late ICAHT grade ≥3 (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.19-7.14; P = .019; and OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.31-4.47; P = .005). A trend toward an association with severe infections was observed (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 0.91-4.48; P = .085). HThigh patients had a lower progression-free and overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.15-2.93; P = .011; and HR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.64-4.87; P < .001, respectively). The HT score identified CART-treated patients with R/R LBCL at risk of clinically significant neutropenia, poor survival outcomes, and potentially severe infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.