Observational studyBlood advances2025
Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide as salvage therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: real-world experience from GELTAMO.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in targeted and cellular therapies for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Challenges of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation and CD19 Testing Following Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide for Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of medical cases · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Before Treatment with Tafasitamab and Lenalidomide: An Ad Hoc Analysis of Italian Real-World Data from the PRO-MIND Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractRelapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) remains challenging to treat, especially in patients ineligible for intensive therapy or chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (T/L) is an effective option based on the phase 2 L-MIND trial findings, although real-world evidence studies have not consistently confirmed these results. We aimed to describe real-world outcomes of R/R DLBCL treated with T/L in Spain. A total of 99 patients received at least 1 dose of tafasitamab (intent-to-treat [ITT] cohort), with 83 completing at least 1 full cycle of T/L (efficacy cohort). Respectively for ITT and efficacy cohorts, at a median follow-up of 19.2 and 21.6 months, the overall response rate was 51% and 61% (complete response [CR], 35% and 42%). Median duration of response was not reached, and patients achieving a CR had excellent outcomes. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 and 10.9 months, and overall survival (OS) was 12.2 and 21.8 months, respectively for both ITT and efficacy cohorts. Neither age nor cumulative illness rating score influenced survival. Better PFS was obtained in first/second relapse but only poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 to 4, double-hit lymphoma, and those with refractory/progressing disease after the previous therapy, were independently associated with worse PFS. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with manageable toxicity. Relative dose intensity of lenalidomide significantly affected response, PFS, and OS. In summary, T/L is both well tolerated and effective, irrespective of age or comorbidities. Our findings provide valuable insights into the real-world application of T/L and reinforce its role as a key treatment option for patients with R/R DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.