Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668579›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Estimated Burden of Influenza and Direct and Indirect Benefits of Influenza Vaccination.

Mary G Krauland, Alexis Mandell, Mark S Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary G KraulandDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alexis MandellPublic Health Dynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mark S RobertsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Vaccination is the safest and most effective way to prevent infectious diseases. It not only reduces disease in the vaccinated portion of a population but also potentially provides indirect benefit to the unvaccinated portion. Indirect benefits to the unvaccinated portion in a population are difficult to estimate since indirect benefits cannot be determined from the general population simply. Objective: To estimate the influenza case burden, both direct and indirect, averted by vaccination using an agent-based model, which models agents as individuals in the simulation population. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this decision analytical modeling study, simulations included varied levels of virus transmissibility, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccine uptake among the 2010 Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, census population. Simulations were run from August 15, 2022, to May 31, 2023. Individuals were vaccinated beginning in September of the simulation year. Exposure: Influenza infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences between number of influenza cases in vaccinated and unvaccinated portions of the population. Results: The population used in this study consisted of 1 218 695 agents (median [IQR] age, 40.6 [3.6-77.6] years; 51% female) and was statistically similar in demographics to the 2010 Allegheny County census population. The mean (SD) burden of influenza averted by vaccination with a vaccine effectiveness of 40% ranged from 32.9% (0.9%) in the high transmission scenario to 41.5% (3.4%) in the low transmission scenario for seasonal influenza. In the model, indirect benefit to the unvaccinated portion of the population was found over a range of modeled transmissibility characteristics of seasonal influenza and varied levels of vaccine effectiveness and vaccination coverage; however, direct benefit to the vaccinated portion was greater in all scenarios. At the highest levels of transmissibility, such as might be found in pandemic influenza, indirect benefit decreased and eventually disappeared. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analytical model study, influenza vaccination provided substantial benefit in reducing infections to both the vaccinated and unvaccinated portions of the population. Even when both vaccine effectiveness and vaccine uptake were low, vaccination showed marked reductions in disease burden for transmission levels characteristic of seasonal influenza. However, when the level of transmission was very high, even a highly effective vaccine did not protect unvaccinated individuals. These findings underscore the importance of vaccination in disease prevention and control and show that indirect benefits are limited in high transmission situations.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaVaccine EfficacyYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40668579
PMCPMC12268489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.