ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Paradigms, innovations, and biological applications of RNA velocity: a comprehensive review.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive benchmarking of RNA velocity methods across single-cell datasets.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- RNAPaceDB: a dedicated database to dissect RNA velocity across diverse cell types.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Lung cancer organoids for functional precision oncology: from disease modeling to clinical decision support.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing enables unprecedented insights into cellular heterogeneity and lineage dynamics. RNA velocity, by modeling the temporal relationship between spliced and unspliced transcripts, extends this capability to predict future transcriptional states and uncover the directionality of cellular transitions. Since the introduction of foundational frameworks such as Velocyto and scVelo, an expanding array of computational tools has emerged, each based on distinct biophysical assumptions and modeling paradigms. To provide a structured overview of this rapidly evolving field, we categorize RNA velocity models into three classes: steady-state methods, trajectory methods, and state extrapolation methods, according to their underlying approaches to transcriptional kinetics inference. For each category, we systematically analyze both the overarching principles and the individual methods, comparing their assumptions, kinetic models, and computational strategies and assessing their respective strengths and limitations. To demonstrate the biological utility of these tools, we summarize representative applications of RNA velocity across developmental biology and diseased microenvironments. We further introduce emerging extensions of RNA velocity methods that go beyond classical splicing kinetics. Finally, we discuss existing limitations regarding model assumptions, preprocessing procedures, and velocity visualization and offer practical recommendations for model selection and application. This review offers a comprehensive guide to the RNA velocity landscape, supporting its effective implementation in dynamic transcriptomic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.