Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668496›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2025

Tukdam, Different Ontological Bodies, and Making Tibetan Deaths Visible.

Donagh Coleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donagh ColemanUniversity of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA. donaghcoleman@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-2774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unknown to science until recently, the postmortem state of tukdam has not yet been adequately explained in biomedical terms. One way to understand this phenomenon is through ideas of different cultural bodies and death processes, where tukdam emerges as a particular kind of Indo-Tibetan death. This article draws upon medical anthropological scholarship and literature in history of science and cross-cultural medicine looking at epistemological theories of perception where different ways of conceiving-perceiving and attending to the body contribute toward producing different medical bodies-and deaths. This epistemological approach has entailed the idea of one reality "out there," which I call into question. I argue instead for an ontological approach, where epistemology and ontology are collapsed so that different forms of conceiving-perceiving contribute toward different forms of being. Such an approach seems apt in the case of different cultural bodies and death processes that we encounter with tukdam and other extraordinary Tibetan death displays. I explore Yogācāra Buddhist philosophy and its Tibetan appropriations along with science studies, medical and ontological anthropology to sketch out theory for how ontologically distinct bodies might come about. Tantric Buddhist bodies and deaths emerge as largely incommensurable with, and invisible to, the modern medical gaze with its attendant Euroamerican regime of truth where visibility, quantification, and technological measurability set the grounds for the real. This regime also dominates in the European documentary film world, as I discovered while making a documentary on tukdam.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathBuddhismDeathAnthropology, MedicalHuman BodyHumansTibetCross-cultural philosophyDocumentary filmIncommensurabilityOntologyTukdam

Identifiers

PMID40668496
PMCPMC12325436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.