ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025
Renal replacement therapy in an intensive care unit: guidelines from the SRLF-GFRUP consensus conference.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mortality, Renal Replacement Therapy and Renal Impairment Markers in Critically Ill Patients in a Multinational Point-Prevalence ICU Cohort over 2007 to 2024: A nutritionDay Descriptive Multivariable Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of postoperative continuous renal replacement therapy initiation after open thoracoabdominal aortic repair.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Slow continuous ultrafiltration and prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy: Tailoring renal replacement therapy in intensive care unit.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- "In-Series" Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort, 2018-2022.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026Article
- Biomarker-Based Diagnosis and Risk Stratification in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: From Molecular Mechanisms to Multimarker Panels.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Acute kidney injury as a prognostic determinant in cardiogenic shock: a cohort study.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Timing of acute kidney injury in infarction-related cardiogenic shock: early onset signals a high-risk phenotype - a retrospective observational study.BMC nephrology · 2026Observational
- A prospective clinical evaluation of new ECCO2R technology in mild to moderate ARDS patients: assessing ultra-lung-protective ventilation with PRISMALUNG.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Discrepancies between declared and real practices of continuous renal replacement therapy for septic acute kidney injury in French intensive care units.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Renal replacement therapy in intensive care unit: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Life-threatening immune-related adverse events in the intensive care unit: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- From "when to stop" to "why continue today?": operationalizing RRT weaning with UUEI.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough largely used, the place of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has yet to be clarified. The French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF) and the French Pediatric Group of Intensive Care and Emergency (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgence Pédiatrique, GFRUP) organized a consensus conference in November 2024.
methodsA committee, without any conflict of interest (CoI) on the subject, defined seven generic questions and drew up a list of sub questions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model. An independent work group reviewed literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Eighteen experts in the field from both societies proposed their own answers in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 14 critical-care medicine physicians and a nurse) and the public. The jury then met for 48 h to write out and vote on its recommendations.
resultsThe panel provided 45 statements addressing seven questions. In patients, adults or children, admitted to the ICU with AKI (1) What are the indications for RRT, when should it be initiated, and within what timeframe? (2) What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different RRT modalities in ICU, and based on what criteria should they be chosen? (3) Which dose of dialysis should be prescribed for ICU patients? (4) How to prescribe, adjust and monitor each RRT technique? (5) Which vascular access technique should be preferred (insertion site, catheter type and length)? (6) How to prevent circuit thrombosis? (7) What are the criteria to consider weaning from RRT and how can it be achieved?
conclusionsThese recommendations should optimize the prescription and use of RRT during AKI in ICUs for both adult and pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.