ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
3D cell culture model - a substitution for future in vivo fish study?
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fish cell lines in aquaculture and biomedical research: A global perspective on development, repositories, and multidisciplinary applications.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Temporal dynamics of thermal warming in brown trout hepatocyte spheroids: ultrastructural and immunocytochemical evidence of cellular remodelling.Cell and tissue research · 2026Article
- In Vitro Fish Cell Culture: From Primary Muscle Cells to Cell-Based Meat in Cyprinidae.Biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models represent an important advancement in fish studies, offering significant improvements over traditional two-dimensional (2D) methods. While 2D cultures remain common in aquaculture research, compelling evidence suggests that 3D techniques provide more physiologically relevant microenvironments by better replicating in vivo tissue architecture and cell-cell interactions. When performing 3D cell culture experiments with fish cells, the cellular environment can be manipulated to closely mimic natural conditions, providing more accurate data about intercellular communications, disease mechanisms, drug responses, and metabolic processes. Various techniques are employed, including scaffold-based systems (hydrogels, polymeric materials), scaffold-free methods (spheroids, bioprinting), and complex structures (organoids, bioengineered organs), each offering distinct advantages for specific applications. While 3D culture systems have been extensively advanced for mammalian cell research, their use in fish cell studies relevant to aquaculture is still limited, with existing efforts largely focused on model organisms like zebrafish and rainbow trout. 3D cell culture has the potential to bridge the gap between traditional cell culture and live animal models in aquaculture research, enabling more relevant physiological studies and reducing the need for animal testing. The present review compares 2D and 3D fish cell culture approaches, details various 3D culture techniques applicable to aquatic species, and examines both current applications and future potential of these advanced culture systems in expanding aquaculture research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40668430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.