ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Distinguishing symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves through radiomics and deep learning: A microstructural study in idiopathic TN patients and asymptomatic control group.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe relationship between mild neurovascular conflict (NVC) and trigeminal neuralgia (TN) remains ill-defined, especially as mild NVC is often seen in asymptomatic population without any facial pain. We aim to analyze the trigeminal nerve microstructure using artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish symptomatic and asymptomatic nerves between idiopathic TN (iTN) and the asymptomatic control group with incidental grade‑1 NVC.
methodsSeventy-eight symptomatic trigeminal nerves with grade-1 NVC in iTN patients, and an asymptomatic control group consisting of Bell's palsy patients free from facial pain (91 grade-1 NVC and 91 grade-0 NVC), were included in the study. Three hundred seventy-eight radiomic features were extracted from the original MRI images and processed with Laplacian-of-Gaussian filters. The dataset was split into 80% training/validation and 20% testing. Nested cross-validation was employed on the training/validation set for feature selection and model optimization. Furthermore, using the same pipeline approach, two customized deep learning models, Dense Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) -201 and MobileASPPV2, were classified using the same pipeline approach, incorporating ASPP blocks.
resultsPerformance was assessed over ten and five runs for radiomics-based and deep learning-based models. Subspace Discriminant Ensemble Learning (SDEL) attained an accuracy of 78.8%±7.13%, Support Vector Machines (SVM) reached 74.8%±9.2%, and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) achieved 79%±6.55%. Meanwhile, DenseASPP-201 recorded an accuracy of 82.0 ± 8.4%, and MobileASPPV2 achieved 73.2 ± 5.59%.
conclusionThe AI effectively distinguished symptomatic and asymptomatic nerves with grade‑1 NVC. Further studies are required to fully elucidate the impact of vascular and nonvascular etiologies that may lead to iTN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40668403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.