Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668340›Full record

ReviewDiscover nano2025

Micro-nanoscale laser subsurface vertical modification of 4H-SiC semiconductor materials: mechanisms, processes, and challenges.

Hongmei Li, Hongwei Wang, Yuxin Li, Xiwen Lu, Lin Li, Yinzhou Yan, Wei Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongmei LiNingbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Hongwei WangNingbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Yuxin LiNingbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Xiwen LuNingbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Lin LiNingbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Yinzhou YanSchool of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Wei GuoNingbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China. guowei123@nimte.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wide-bandgap semiconductor materials, exemplified by silicon carbide (SiC), have emerged as pivotal materials in semiconductor devices due to their exceptional chemical stability, high electron mobility, and thermal stability. With the rapid development of microelectronic devices and integrated optical circuits, the demand for high-yield and high-quality processing of SiC wafer has intensified. Traditional SiC wafer processing technologies suffer from low efficiency and high material loss, making it difficult to meet industrial demands. Therefore, the development of efficient, low-damage processing techniques has become a pressing issue in the SiC wafer processing field. Ultrashort pulsed laser processing, with its advantages of contact free processing, no mechanical stress, and small heat-affected zones, has garnered significant attention in SiC wafer processing in recent years. By generating a modified layer within the material, laser processing plays a crucial role in wafer fabrication. However, the key challenge lies in precisely controlling the thickness of the modified layer down to the micro-nano scale to minimize material loss. This review systematically discusses the interaction mechanisms and modification processes of laser with wide-bandgap semiconductor SiC materials. It focuses on the core issue in laser modification technology, where nonlinear effects make it difficult to precisely control the modification layer depth, thereby affecting both modification quality and processing efficiency. To address this, the paper summarizes the differences in modification mechanisms with lasers of varying pulse durations and proposes a multi-strategy solution to improve modification quality and processing efficiency through pulse control and synergistic optimization of process parameters. Additionally, this review provides a comprehensive overview of advanced SiC wafer detachment processes, including cold cracking stripping, chemically assisted stripping, ultrasonic stripping, and multi-laser composite stripping, and identifies the primary challenges and future directions in the field of SiC wafer processing.

Indexed as

Laser modificationLaser pulse controlNonlinear absorptionSilicon carbide semiconductorWafer stripping

Identifiers

PMID40668340
PMCPMC12267809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.