Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668270›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

Predicting PD-L1 expression status in NSCLC using radiomic analysis of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT images.

Fanni Júlia Kiss, Anna Izabell Járó, Domokos Máthé, Csaba Benedek, Vilmos Madaras, Andrea Manno-Kovács, Árpád László Bartha, Parasuraman Padmanabhan, Ramasamy Paulmurugan, Eszter Regős and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Tumor Characterization Using [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fanni Júlia Kiss *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna Izabell Járó *Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Domokos MáthéDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba BenedekHUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (HUN-REN SZTAKI), Budapest, Hungary.
Vilmos MadarasHUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (HUN-REN SZTAKI), Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea Manno-KovácsHUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (HUN-REN SZTAKI), Budapest, Hungary.
Árpád László BarthaInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Parasuraman PadmanabhanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang, Singapore.
Ramasamy PaulmuruganCanary Center for Cancer Early Detection, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Eszter RegősDepartment of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás Györke *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Krisztián Szigeti *Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. krisztian.szigeti@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-9828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLung cancer is the most prevalent malignancy globally, with prognosis and treatment largely influenced by histological and molecular analyses. Molecular features like PD-L1 positivity help identify patients suitable for immunotherapy. However, obtaining histological samples can be challenging and limited. Radiomic analysis of imaging data provides a non-invasive way to characterize tumor heterogeneity and its complex patterns, which may help predict PD-L1 expression. This study investigates the efficacy of radiomics in forecasting PD-L1 status in NSCLC patients using 18 F-FDG-PET/CT images.

methodsIn this retrospective study, the primary staging 18 F-FDG-PET/CT scans of 105 patients with NSCLC of different phenotypes (72 ACC, 33 SCC, 64 PD-L1 positive, 41 PD-L1 negative) were analysed. Various segmentation techniques were employed. Radiomic features were obtained from the original and transformed images using the PyRadiomics package. Records were split into training and test sets in the ratio of 7:3. Feature reduction involved the Mann-Whitney U test, LASSO regression, and Spearman correlation analysis. A logistic regression model was developed using the selected features, and performance was assessed with ROC curve, AUC score, and other metrics.

resultsThe optimal model achieved an AUC of 0.783 (95% CI: 0.625, 942), with high accuracy (81.25%), sensitivity (90.00%), PPV (81.81%), and NPV (80.00%).

conclusionRadiomic features derived from 18 F-FDG-PET/CT images can potentially differentiate between PD-L1 positive and negative NSCLC. Consequently, radiomics with multimodal imaging presents a promising non-invasive approach for selecting patients who may benefit from targeted immunotherapy.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-FDG-PET/CTComputed tomography (CT)Non-small cell lung cancerPD-L1Positron-emission tomography (PET)Radiomics

Identifiers

PMID40668270
PMCPMC12830409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.