Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668231›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2025

Clinical heterogeneity and phenotyping of post cardiac arrest brain injury: one size may not fit all.

Mypinder S Sekhon, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Markus B Skrifvars, Donald E Griesdale, Jonathan Elmer, Lionel Velly, Chiara Robba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mypinder S SekhonDjavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. mypindersekhon@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4487-301X
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Markus B SkrifvarsDepartment of Emergency Care and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Donald E GriesdaleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jonathan ElmerUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Lionel VellyService d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Hôpital La Timone and Institut des Neurosciences, MeCA, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Chiara RobbaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-cardiac arrest brain injury (PCABI) emanates from the injurious pathophysiologic sequelae that take place during and after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Regrettably, identification of efficacious management strategies to mitigate PCABI has been disappointing with numerous well-conducted randomized control trials yielding neutral results. The reasons for this observation are likely multifactorial, however, increasingly patient and disease-specific heterogeneity is recognized as a crucial factor in clinical decision-making. Traditionally, PCABI has been stratified based upon simple historical characteristics (e.g. location of cardiac arrest, initial rhythm, witnessed vs. unwitnessed) that inadequately reflect in vivo PCABI severity or responses to clinical interventions within individual patients. It is therefore increasingly clear that this approach to PCABI is insufficient. In other syndromes, such as sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome, attempts to identify early "phenotypes" of patients reflect growing recognition of considerable between-patient heterogeneity in the disease mechanisms and response to therapeutic interventions. A similar approach should be taken with PCABI. In this review, we described the clinical heterogeneity and phenotypes of PCABI as related to the underlying pathophysiology, selective anatomical vulnerability and electrographic patterns. The overarching aim of the review is the propose a shift to expeditious phenotyping of PCABI severity that focuses on assessing in vivo severity and patterns of injury that could be used for future targeted therapies. We will also discuss potential causes of heterogeneous clinical responses to interventions and highlight future research areas for PCABI that focus on phenotyping and incorporating these considerations into clinical trials.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHeart ArrestCardiopulmonary ResuscitationHumansPhenotypeCardiac arrestHeterogeneityPhenotypesPost-cardiac arrest brain injuryReturn of spontaneous circulation

Identifiers

PMID40668231
PMCPMC12283859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.