ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Prediction of local convergent shifts in evolutionary rates with phyloConverge.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationConvergence analysis can characterize genetic elements underlying morphological adaptations. However, its performance on regulatory elements is limited due to their modular composition of transcription factor motifs, which have rapid turnover and experience different evolutionary pressures.
resultsWe introduce phyloConverge, a phylogenetic method that performs scalable, fine-grained local convergence analysis of genomic elements at flexible length scales. Using a benchmarking case of convergent subterranean mammal adaptation, phyloConverge identifies rate-accelerated conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) with high specificity and statistical robustness relative to competing methods. From CNE-level scoring, we detect the convergent regression of entire CNE units and highlight the contrast that subterranean-associated coding region regression is highly specific to ocular functions, whereas regulatory element regression is enriched for accompanying neuronal phenotypes and other developmental processes. From transcription factor motif-level scoring, we dissect elements into subregions with uneven convergence signals and demonstrate the modular adaptation of CNEs with high functional specificity. Finally, we demonstrate phyloConverge's scalability to perform high-resolution convergence analysis genome-wide. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: phyloConverge is available at https://github.com/ECSaputra/phyloConverge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.