ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2025
MR-Transformer: A Vision Transformer-based Deep Learning Model for Total Knee Replacement Prediction Using MRI.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading Using Contrastive Learning Image Pre-Training.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To develop a transformer-based deep learning model-MR-Transformer-that leverages ImageNet pretraining and three-dimensional spatial correlations to predict the progression of knee osteoarthritis to total knee replacement using MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 353 case-control matched pairs of coronal intermediate-weighted turbo spin-echo (COR-IW-TSE) and sagittal intermediate-weighted turbo spin-echo with fat suppression (SAG-IW-TSE-FS) knee MRI scans from the Osteoarthritis Initiative database, with a follow-up period up to 9 years, and 270 case-control matched pairs of coronal short-tau inversion recovery (COR-STIR) and sagittal proton-density fat-saturated (SAG-PD-FAT-SAT) knee MRI scans from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study database, with a follow-up period up to 7 years. Performance of the MR-Transformer to predict the progression of knee osteoarthritis was compared with that of existing state-of-the-art deep learning models (TSE-Net, 3DMeT, and MRNet) using sevenfold nested cross-validation across the four MRI tissue sequences. Results Among the 353 Osteoarthritis Initiative case-control pairs, 215 were women (mean age, 63 years ± 8 [SD]); among the 270 Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study case-control pairs, 203 were women (mean age, 65 years ± 7). The MR-Transformer achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.91), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.90), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.89), and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.87) for COR-IW-TSE, SAG-IW-TSE-FS, COR-STIR, and SAG-PD-FAT-SAT, respectively. The model achieved a higher AUC than that of 3DMeT for all MRI sequences (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.