ReviewJournal of vision2025
Human retinotopic mapping: From empirical to computational models of retinotopy.
Review in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting functional topography of the human visual cortex from cortical anatomy at scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mapping the visual cortex with Zebra noise and wavelets.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field modeling.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field decoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual cortex encodes the visual field through numerous bilaterally paired, topologically organized two-dimensional maps along the cortical surface. Although these representations exhibit a largely consistent organization across individuals, substantial interindividual variability exists in both the structure and functional organization of the visual cortex. To better characterize this variability, researchers have increasingly turned to computational approaches, alongside empirical methodologies and encoding models, to predict individual-level retinotopic organization. As these advances continue to shape the study of retinotopic organization, it is crucial to revisit the methodologies used to generate and model these maps. In this review, we examine empirical and theoretical work aimed at reconstructing and modeling visual field maps in the human visual cortex. Specifically, we discuss how empirical retinotopic mapping has facilitated the development of theoretical and computational models of retinotopy and, in turn, how these models have enhanced our understanding of the retinotopic organization of the human visual cortex. Finally, we outline a non-exhaustive set of future directions for leveraging models of retinotopy to further investigate structure-function relationships, interindividual variability, and more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.