ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Quantitative Assessment of Microsurgical Skill in Intrascleral Fixation Surgery Using Wearable Strain Sensors: A Pilot Study.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating force and motion in posterior vitreous detachment manoeuvres using a robotic data acquisition system in cadaveric human eyes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel method using stretchable strain sensors for analyzing hand movements during simulated intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation, allowing differentiation between expert and novice surgeons. Methods: Six participants (3 experts and 3 novices) performed intrascleral IOL fixation on a simulated eye model while wearing stretchable strain sensors on all fingers to capture real-time finger movements. Two critical procedural phases were defined: leading and trailing haptic insertions (critical process [CP]1 and CP2, respectively). Time-series data extracted from the sensors were processed using "tsfresh" to compute multidimensional features, and they were classified using a light-gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Performance was assessed using three-fold cross-validation, and the feature space was further explored using principal component analysis (PCA). Results: In total, 107 procedures were analyzed. Experts completed CP1 and CP2 more quickly than novices. Feature extraction yielded 899 and 472 features for CP1 and CP2, respectively. The LightGBM classifier achieved high accuracy in distinguishing experts from novices, with average accuracies of approximately 87% to 88% for CP1 and 86% to 87% for CP2. PCA showed that thumb and index finger movements of the dominant hand substantially contributed to the discrimination of skill levels. Conclusions: Our findings showed the feasibility of using wearable strain sensors to quantify microsurgical finger movements, facilitating objective evaluation of surgical skills. This approach represents a promising step toward more refined and data-driven surgical training and evaluation methods. Translational Relevance: This novel sensor-based method could help refine surgical training and evaluation, potentially enhancing patient safety and outcomes through data-driven skill assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.