ArticleBone & joint research2025
The impact of cementing technique in polished taper fit hip stems : a modelling analysis of implant-cement interface.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pile foundation reconstruction prosthesis for severe acetabular bone defects : principle, design, and mechanical analysis.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- Maximizing stem body size may reduce the risk of postoperative periprosthetic fractures : an analysis of 2,757 CPT femoral components.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- A mechanobiological hypothesis on bone cement-induced progression of bone metastases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cemented polished taper fit (PTF) stems are the femoral implant of choice for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in many locations worldwide. There is increasing evidence that periprosthetic fracture may be the single major contributor to reoperation with these stems. The aim of this study was to demonstrate how mismatches at the implant-cement interface may occur and the subsequent effect of these incongruities on the contacting area and the forces transmitted to the cement mantle. Methods: A parametric equation-based model was developed to determine the contact mismatch relative to axial stem rotations. This model was also used to calculate the restoration of contact surface area with stem subsidence for both a dual-taper and triple-taper geometry. A finite element analysis (FEA) was used to compare the effects of reduced contact area due to the incongruent hip implant-cement interface. Results: The contact model showed a large decrease in surface contact area with even only a small rotation going from 100% at 0° to 50.00% at 2.5° for the dual-taper geometry, and from 100% at 0° to 50.20% at 2.5° for the triple-taper geometry. There was a gradual but small ongoing decrease in contact surface with increasing rotation for both the dual-taper and triple-taper geometries. For both taper designs, there was an increase in contact surface area with an increase in subsidence resulting in contact for up to a 5° mismatch being restored with 2 mm subsidence. FEA showed that with increasing mismatches and consequent contact area reduction, there was an increase in von Mises stress in the implant-cement interface of up to 235%. Conclusion: With increasing mismatch, there was an increase in maximum stresses, total strain, and subsidence in the cement mantle, highlighting the importance of achieving an optimal implant-cement interface at the time of implantation of cemented PTF femoral stems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.