ArticleCritical care science2025
Apnea testing for brain death confirmation in VV-ECMO patients with very low sweep flow: a case reports and practical physiological insights.
Article in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has become a critical therapeutic tool for patients with severe respiratory failure. Neurological complications, including brain death, are common in this population, and confirming brain death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients presents unique challenges. In Brazil, an apnea test is mandatory for confirming brain death. However, its application in patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which predominantly addresses venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases, is not well defined in the literature. This report outlines our standardized approach for conducting apnea tests in three patients with suspected brain death during ongoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. We describe three cases from a cohort of 93 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients treated for severe respiratory failure. The apnea test was conducted after 24 hours of observation without sedation. Given the physiological nuances of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, where carbon dioxide clearance is primarily influenced by sweep flow, we adopted a low-sweep-flow protocol (200mL/minute) to achieve a partial pressure of carbon dioxide greater than 55mmHg, consistent with brain death criteria. In cases of severe hypoxemia during the test, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flow can be temporarily increased to maintain oxygenation. All patients received concurrent renal support, which also facilitated carbon dioxide clearance. Our findings suggest that the apnea test with very low sweep flow is a safe and feasible method for diagnosing brain death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients. This physiologically grounded approach provides a clinically viable strategy for managing the complex interplay between gas exchange, oxygenation, and carbon dioxide clearance during the apnea test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.