Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40667953›Full record

Observational studyAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025

Identifying subphenotypes of patients undergoing post-operative delirium assessment.

Emily Margaret Louise Bowman, Daniel F McAuley, Bernadette McGuinness, Anthony P Passmore, David Beverland, Henrik Zetterberg, Jonathan M Schott, Amanda Heslegrave, Elena Veleva, Rhiannon Laban and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying subphenotypes of patients undergoing post-operative delirium assessment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emily Margaret Louise BowmanCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Science, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-0288
Daniel F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Bernadette McGuinnessCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Science, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Anthony P PassmoreCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Science, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
David BeverlandOutcomes Assessment Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Henrik ZetterbergUK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Jonathan M SchottUK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Amanda HeslegraveUK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Elena VelevaUK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Rhiannon LabanUK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Aoife SweeneyCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Science, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Emma L CunninghamCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Science, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

Belfast Arthroplasty Research Trust (now TORCNI)Belfast Trust Charitable FundsDepartment for the EconomySiew Keok Chin Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelirium has heterogeneous etiologies and clinical presentations and is often associated with poor outcomes. Its pathophysiological mechanisms remain largely hypothetical and without targeted pharmacological treatment. This work investigates subphenotypes of patients undergoing delirium assessment based on clinical features and fluid biomarkers.

methodsWe performed latent class analysis of an observational cohort of older adults undergoing elective surgery.

resultsTwo classes were identified, both containing individuals experiencing delirium symptoms, with a higher number in Class 1 (p < 0.001). Class 1 were older, less educated, and had more depression (p < 0.001). They performed worse in all pre-operative cognitive assessments (p < 0.001) and had more markers of central nervous system damage: cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (p < 0.001); plasma phosphorylated tau (p = 0.024); and amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (p < 0.001). Class 2 experienced more pain (p = 0.006) and received more morphine equivalents (p = 0.018). DISCUSSION: Delirium and neighboring phenotypes should be investigated thoroughly in the newly dawning era of precision medicine, to establish novel treatments. HIGHLIGHTS: Latent class analysis identified two subphenotypes of patients. Both groups contained patients with delirium or its individual symptoms. Groups differed by age, education, depression, independent living, and pain levels. Groups differed by pre-operative and post-operative cognition. Groups differed by biomarker levels of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury.

Indexed as

DeliriumPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMalePhenotypetau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau Proteinsaltered consciousnessbiomarkerscognitioncognitive changedeliriumendotypesglial fibrillary acidic proteininattentionlatent class analysismachine learningneurofilament light chainphenotypingpost‐operativepost‐operative deliriumsubphenotypesunsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID40667953
PMCPMC12265012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.