ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Glass Ionomer Cements with Halloysite-CHX: Physicochemical Properties, Antimicrobial Activity, Cell Viability.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biological Performance of Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: Antibacterial Activity, Cytocompatibility, and Rabbit Pulpal Response.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the physicochemical, cell viability, and antimicrobial properties of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) modified by the incorporation of halloysite nanotubes (HNT) doped with chlorhexidine (CHX). HNT-CHX was added to GIC at concentrations of 2.5% and 5% by weight, forming three experimental groups: a control group (GIC only), a group with 2.5% HNT-CHX, and another with 5% HNT-CHX. Hourglass-shaped specimens (n=10) were used to measure cohesive strength and elastic modulus, while fractured specimens were subjected to microhardness testing (n = 5). To assess the alkalinizing activity (pH) and the release of F-, Ca+2, and PO4-3 ions (n = 3), discs were prepared for CHX release analysis by UV-vis after 24 hours. Antimicrobial activity was tested against S. mutans biofilm (CFU/ml), and material cell viability was determined using the MTT assay. Results showed that the 5% HNT-CHX group presented the lowest cohesive strength, while the 2.5% and 5% HNT-CHX groups displayed modulus values similar to the control and did not affect microhardness. All groups exhibited an acidic pH with the control group releasing higher levels of F-, Ca+2, and PO4 -3 ions. The HNT-CHX 2.5% and HNT-CHX 5% groups reduced fluoride ion release compared to the control (GIC). The 5% HNT-CHX group showed the highest levels of free CHX and demonstrated bactericidal activity against S. mutans in CFU analysis. None of the materials presented cytotoxicity. In conclusion, incorporating 2.5% and 5% HNT-CHX affected the mechanical properties and ion release of the GIC. HNT-CHX 5% group exhibited antimicrobial against S. mutans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.