ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2026
The Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Utilization in Australasia: A Survey of Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia Members.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in oncology practice: A global survey by the Young Committee of the International Society of Liquid Biopsy (ISLB).The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- The Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Utilization in Australasia: A Survey of Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia Members.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the current status of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) utilization for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among members of the Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia (TOGA), and to identify barriers to its implementation in clinical practice across Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).
methodsA 31-item electronic survey was distributed to TOGA members between December 2023 and August 2024. Responses were analysed descriptively to assess access, usage patterns, perceived barriers, and clinician attitudes toward ctDNA testing.
resultsThirty complete responses were analysed. Most respondents were medical oncologists working in metropolitan academic or public hospitals. While respondents estimated 83% of patients have access to molecular testing, only 12% were believed to have access to ctDNA testing. Only 33% reported routine ctDNA use, primarily in advanced disease settings. If more accessible, 83% indicated they would adopt ctDNA in advanced NSCLC. Key barriers to ctDNA utilization included cost (93%), logistical challenges (63%), limited knowledge (50%), and assay confidence (40%). Although over half of clinicians had patients inquire about ctDNA, fewer than 40% routinely discussed it. Most preferred are in-person or virtual workshops for education. Notably, 30% lacked access to a Molecular Tumor Board, and 70% did not provide pre-test counselling regarding incidental germline findings.
conclusionDespite limited current use, there is strong interest in ctDNA testing for NSCLC in ANZ. Addressing funding, logistical barriers, and clinician education is essential to enabling equitable, widespread adoption of ctDNA into standard lung cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.