ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2025
Duration of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatments in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Adherence Trajectories of First-Line Nucleotide Analogues among US Older Adults with Chronic Hepatitis B.Drugs & aging · 2026Article
- Duration of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatments in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2025Article
- Association of alanine aminotransferase flares with hepatitis B surface antigen loss and clinical outcomes in treated and untreated patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A US retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Viral hepatitis caused by hepatitis B virus accounts for a significant disease burden. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are the standard of care for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection; however, treatment is long-term, and viral eradication resulting in cure is rare. Adherence to NAs is vital for disease control. Here, we describe real-world treatment patterns among adult patients with CHB infection initiating second-generation NAs in the United States. This retrospective cohort study used United States administrative claims data. From the January 1, 2006 to July 31, 2023 period, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with CHB infection who initiated second-generation NAs. Patient characteristics and real-world NA utilisation measures were reported, including time to discontinuation, resumption of NA treatment, adherence and predictors of adherence. In total, 6696 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Mean age was 47.2 (standard deviation: 11.5) years, and 41.6% of patients were female. The most common index NA treatments were tenofovir alafenamide (48.5%) and entecavir (41.7%). Median follow-up duration was 24.4 months. Overall, 40.6% of patients discontinued treatment; discontinuation probability was 29.4% at 12 months and 55.6% at 5 years. Of those who discontinued, 45.7% restarted during the study period. Mean adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) was 0.91, and 86.5% of participants had a PDC ≥ 80%. This study highlights the challenge of long-term persistence with NA treatment. An unmet need in CHB infection management is novel treatments with finite durations that offer an opportunity to achieve cure and mitigate disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.