ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
Are they all the same? Different effects of opioid types on survival in metastatic NSCLC receiving nivolumab.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Crosstalk Between Opioids and the Anti-Tumour Immune Checkpoint Axis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) use and types of OA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving nivolumab. This observational, retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed, driver mutations negative metastatic NSCLC at five different hospitals in Turkey between 2018 and 2024. A total of 209 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 113 (54.1%) used OA. 86 (41.1%) patients were using tramadol, and 48 (23.4%) were using fentanyl. The median survival of the group without OA was significant in the univariate analysis compared to that of the group with OA PFS (7 vs. 4 months, P = 0.006) an OS (8 vs. 14 months, P = 0.003). The group with bone metastases had worse OS than the group without bone metastases [7 vs. 15 months, HR (95% CI) = 1.810 (1.064-3.079), (P = 0.029)]. In the group without bone metastases, patients on tramadol had worse PFS than patients not on tramadol [5 vs. 8 months, HR (95% CI) = 2.260 (1.097-4.655), (P = 0.027)]. In conclusion, OA use was associated with poor PFS and OS. Fentanyl use led to worse OS in the group with bone metastases, whereas tramadol use led to worse PFS in the group without bone metastases. The prognostic impact of OA may differ according to the site of metastasis; therefore, prospective studies that include the type of OA are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.