ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025
A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK TWO-PART MODEL AND FEATURE IMPORTANCE TEST FOR SEMI-CONTINUOUS DATA.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revised Deep Learning Semiparametric Regression for Testing and Estimating Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Observational Studies: A Lung Transplant Case Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK TWO-PART MODEL AND FEATURE IMPORTANCE TEST FOR SEMI-CONTINUOUS DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semi-continuous data frequently arise in clinical practice. For example, while many surgical patients still suffer from varying degrees of acute postoperative pain (POP) sometime after surgery (i.e., POP score > 0), others experience none (i.e., POP score = 0), indicating the existence of two distinct data processes at play. Existing parametric or semi-parametric two-part modeling methods for this type of semi-continuous data can fail to appropriately model the two underlying data processes as such methods rely heavily on (generalized) linear additive assumptions. However, many factors may interact to jointly influence the experience of POP non-additively and non-linearly. Motivated by this challenge and inspired by the flexibility of deep neural networks (DNN) to accurately approximate complex functions universally, we derive a DNN-based two-part model by adapting the conventional DNN methods with two additional components: a bootstrapping procedure along with a filtering algorithm to boost the stability of the conventional DNN, an approach we denote as sDNN. To improve the interpretability and transparency of sDNN, we further derive a feature importance testing procedure to identify important features associated with the outcome measurements of the two data processes, denoting this approach fsDNN. We show that fsDNN not only offers a statistical inference procedure for each feature under complex association but also that using the identified features can further improve the predictive performance of sDNN. The proposed sDNN- and fsDNN-based two-part models are applied to the analysis of real data from a POP study, in which application they clearly demonstrate advantages over the existing parametric and semi-parametric two-part models. Further, we conduct extensive numerical studies and draw comparisons with other machine learning methods to demonstrate that sDNN and fsDNN consistently outperform the existing two-part models and frequently used machine learning methods regardless of the data complexity. An R package implementing the proposed methods has been developed and is available in the Supplementary Material (Zou et al, 2025) and is also deposited on GitHub (https://github.com/BZou-lab/fsDNN).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.