Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40667506›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Efficacy and safety of stem cells in the treatment of glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal experiments.

Danning Wu, Yanjing Liu, Xia Zhang, Ruixuan Zhang, Shaopeng Wang, Hui Lu, Tao Yue

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danning WuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Yanjing LiuKey Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science of Zibo City, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Xia ZhangKey Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science of Zibo City, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Ruixuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science of Zibo City, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Shaopeng WangKey Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science of Zibo City, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Hui LuKey Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science of Zibo City, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Tao YueDepartment of Geriatrics, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Glaucoma, characterized by progressive retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration and optic nerve atrophy, remains a leading global cause of irreversible blindness, despite advancements in clinical management. While current therapies predominantly focus on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), neuroprotective strategies to preserve visual function remain an unmet clinical need. Stem cells exhibit high proliferative capacity and multilineage differentiation potential, demonstrating notable efficacy in glaucoma treatment. Emerging preclinical evidence further highlights dual neuroprotective mechanisms (i.e., paracrine neurotrophic support and cellular replacement) of stem cell-based interventions. Accordingly, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of stem cell transplantation in experimental glaucoma models, with a focus on functional outcomes (IOP modulation), structural preservation (RGC survival, and nerve fiber layer integrity), and neuroprotective efficacy. Methods: A systematic literature retrieval from multiple online databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CNKI, WFSD, VIP, and CBM) was conducted through 3 January 2025, to identify relevant animal experimental studies. After the assessment of the risk of bias in the listed articles, this study further computed effect sizes of stem cell transplantation on indices such as IOP, RGC count. Statistical analyses were completed using RevMan 5.3. Results: In the meta-analysis involving 19 studies, the stem cell transplantation group had significantly lower IOP (MD = -1.55,95% CI = -2.62 to -0.47) at weeks 3 and 4, higher RGC count at weeks 2, 3, and 4 (MD = 23.06,95%CI = 18.22-27.89), and greater nerve fiber layer thickness (MD = 10.69, 95%CI = 9.44-11.94) compared to the control group. Meanwhile, the stem cell transplantation group also had higher retinal BDNF expression at weeks 2 and 4 (MD = 0.75,95%CI = 0.67-0.83), GDNF expression at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and IGF-1 expression (MD = 0.49,95%CI = 0.39-0.58). None of these studies reported any adverse systemic events. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides preclinical evidence supporting stem cell transplantation as a multimodal therapeutic strategy for glaucoma, demonstrating significant efficacy in IOP modulation, neurostructural preservation, and neurotrophic factor expression. Given the severity of glaucoma-induced ocular structural damage, it underscores the significance of stem cell transplantation as a secure and promising therapeutic option with notable neuroprotective potential, despite existing translational challenges regarding optimal cell sources, delivery routes, and long-term safety profiles. Systematic Review Registration: www.inplasy.com, identifier 202520023.

Indexed as

animal experimentglaucomameta-analysisrandomized controlled trialsstem cells

Identifiers

PMID40667506
PMCPMC12259681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.