ReviewGeneral psychiatry2025
An effective short form of the 20-item University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3: item response theory and network psychometrics.
Review in General psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resilient interpersonal pathways from loneliness to suicidal ideation among Chinese transgender women during global health crises.General psychiatry · 2026Article
- Distress as a bridge to suicidality in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a network-based intervention simulation study.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness is a complex and usually unpleasant emotional response to isolation, which has been considered the latest global health epidemic exacerbated by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, affecting nearly two-thirds of older adults. Some profound health implications carried by loneliness include depression, cognitive impairment, hypertension and frailty. Across the world, there is no consensus definition of loneliness, and its measure is based on the phenomenological perspective of the individual. The 20-item University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 (UCLA-20) is the most common measure. This scale demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties but is too long and complex for a phone interview. This paper addresses the increasing need to shorten this scale by adopting classical item response theory and network psychometrics to advance scale development. Through an item reduction analysis, we trimmed the original scale into an effective short form, which is as valid as the original one. With respondents' time at a premium in most research nowadays, this short-form scale is an efficient and practical alternative to the original UCLA-20.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.