ArticleOpen life sciences2025
Optimizing the encapsulation of the refined extract of squash peels for functional food applications: A sustainable approach to reduce food waste.
Article in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Encapsulation of the refined extract from squash fruit peels was evaluated for the design of functional foods with beneficial effects on human health. The percentage of maltodextrin and gum Arabic in the wall material as well as the concentration of the refined extract were the independent variables for the Box Behnken design, and their impact on response variables (total phenolic compound [TPC] content, DPPH activity, the size of particles, and polydispersity index [Pdi]) was evaluated. The obtained emulsions were compared based on their TPC content, as well as their antioxidant activities. Optimum conditions were as follows: maltodextrin percentage of 23.8%, gum Arabic percentage of 27.7%, and phenolic extract percentage of 48.5%. Under these conditions, the response variables were the following: TPC content of 46.01 mg of gallic acid equivalent per gram of extract (mg GAE/g of E); DPPH inhibition percentage of 64.85% at 1 mg/mL, particle size of 571.22 nm, and Pdi of 0.46. Once the emulsion was optimized, we tried to define the combination of variables that produced microcapsules with the highest TPC content and the highest antioxidant activity. Physicochemical parameters and biological activities were also assessed. Microcapsule parameters were a pH of 4.2, a viscosity of 17 mPa/s, and a turbidity of 0.412 NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units), and color measurements were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.