ArticleSurgical case reports2025
Duodenocaval Fistula Caused by Post-Bulbar Duodenal Ulcer: A Case Report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDuodenocaval fistula (DCF) is a rare, life-threatening disease with a mortality rate of approximately 40%. There are several types of etiologies for DCF. Among these, duodenal ulcers are the most dangerous, with a mortality rate of 63.6%. This report describes a case of DCF caused by a duodenal ulcer that was successfully diagnosed and treated, and discusses why duodenal ulcer-induced DCF results in severe outcomes, with a review of the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old male patient was transferred to our hospital for surgical treatment of DCF. An emergency laparotomy was performed. We opened the abscess cavity, repaired the perforation site and inferior vena cava, and performed gastrojejunostomy. After the operation, anastomotic leakage was suspected. Although we treated him with antibiotics and antifungal drugs, his condition did not improve, and he experienced elevated total bilirubin and inflammation. Therefore, we decided to perform a reoperation on postoperative day (POD) 30, including cholecystectomy, insertion of a C-tube into the common bile duct for biliary drainage, enterostomy, and peritoneal irrigation and drainage. After that, the patient continued antibiotic and antifungal therapy, with periodic drain flushing and replacement. His condition slowly improved, and he was transferred to another facility for rehabilitation on POD 158.
conclusionsDCF caused by duodenal ulcers has a higher mortality rate than that caused by other etiologies. Therefore, initiating broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungal therapy early may be beneficial. Also, it is reasonable to perform simple, rapid, and minimally invasive surgery in an emergency setting. However, even in emergency situations, duodenal decompression, cholecystectomy, and biliary drainage should be performed to prevent anastomotic leakage and biliary complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.