Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40667400›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Body Schema plasticity of the arm: a systematic review of the methods and tasks.

Anna Zigrino, Pierpaolo Zivi, Fabio Ferlazzo, Stefano Sdoia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna ZigrinoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo ZiviDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fabio FerlazzoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stefano SdoiaDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Body Schema represents the body in a way that allows for dynamic adaptation and integration of motor functions. It receives signals from different sensory modalities, including proprioception, vision and touch, to continuously update to plan and execute body movements. Moreover, it works synergistically with the Peripersonal Space, to enable efficient interactions with the outside world. To do so, the Body Schema temporarily alters itself, plastically adapting to different environmental requests. This work aims at reviewing and categorizing the most commonly used methods in the study of Body Schema, as an attempt to better understand its plasticity and adaptability in different circumstances. Methods: Two prominent databases, namely Scopus and PsychInfo, were consulted. The eligibility criteria included studies conducted on humans, wherein the population was not clinical. Finally, studies were included in which the Body Schema was considered in isolation, without comparison to other body representations. Results: The selected papers were grouped into ten different categories, illustrating the various ways in which the Body Schema has been investigated. Discussion: Different methods to study the plasticity of the Body Schema are discussed. Moreover, it is hypothesized that two common denominators are fundamental for granting the Body Schema its functions: proprioception and sense of agency. Clinical and future research implications are discussed.

Indexed as

agencyBody Schemaperipersonal spaceplasticityproprioception

Identifiers

PMID40667400
PMCPMC12259554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.