SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Body Schema plasticity of the arm: a systematic review of the methods and tasks.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic Balance Control and Postural Adaptation in Human-Robot Collaborative Manipulation: Within-Subject Experimental Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Body Schema represents the body in a way that allows for dynamic adaptation and integration of motor functions. It receives signals from different sensory modalities, including proprioception, vision and touch, to continuously update to plan and execute body movements. Moreover, it works synergistically with the Peripersonal Space, to enable efficient interactions with the outside world. To do so, the Body Schema temporarily alters itself, plastically adapting to different environmental requests. This work aims at reviewing and categorizing the most commonly used methods in the study of Body Schema, as an attempt to better understand its plasticity and adaptability in different circumstances. Methods: Two prominent databases, namely Scopus and PsychInfo, were consulted. The eligibility criteria included studies conducted on humans, wherein the population was not clinical. Finally, studies were included in which the Body Schema was considered in isolation, without comparison to other body representations. Results: The selected papers were grouped into ten different categories, illustrating the various ways in which the Body Schema has been investigated. Discussion: Different methods to study the plasticity of the Body Schema are discussed. Moreover, it is hypothesized that two common denominators are fundamental for granting the Body Schema its functions: proprioception and sense of agency. Clinical and future research implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.