Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40667396›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Developmental Ecological Psychology meets organicist biology: the example of the ecological self.

Catherine Read, Agnes Szokolszky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine ReadRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Agnes SzokolszkyInstitute of Psychology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we outline an ecological-organicist theoretical framework to understand human development. The ecological approach to development (Developmental Ecological Psychology, DEP) places the organism at the center and has a mutualist theoretical framework with an epistemic foundation in direct perception. While research in this tradition has paid much attention to specific developmental questions at a young age (such as perceptual learning, affordances, and action coordination), less effort has gone into the discussion of theoretical issues of overall development at the level of organism-environment mutuality. Meanwhile in biology, a new emphasis on the organism as an explanatory concept and level of analysis has been asserted (e.g., Nicholson, 2014). In this paper, we are seeking possible fruitful ideas at the intersection of the ecological approach and the renewed organicist thinking in biology. We suggest that organicist ideas are relevant for an ecological theory of development and the epistemic foundation of direct perception is important for a consistently mutualist organicism. We examine Waddington's epigenetic landscape model and Gottlieb's probabilistic epigenesis from an ecological-organicist point of view and suggest, in contrast, a consistently ecological-organicist approach to self, i.e., the ecological self, based on J.J. Gibson's idea of co-perceiving self and surround.

Indexed as

developmentDevelopmental Ecological Psychologyecological-organicist theoretical frameworkecological selfJames Gibsonorganicist biology

Identifiers

PMID40667396
PMCPMC12261450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.