ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Variations in neuronal selectivity create efficient representational geometries for perception.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our visual capabilities depend on neural response properties in visual areas of our brains. Neurons exhibit a wide variety of selective response properties, but the reasons for this diversity are unknown. Here, we related the distribution of neuronal tuning properties to the information capacity of the population. Our results from theory, simulations, and analysis of recordings from macaque primary visual cortex (V1) reveal that diversity of amplitude and bandwidth drive complementary changes to the representational geometry of a population. Amplitude diversity pushes the centers of the representations further apart, whereas bandwidth heterogeneity decorrelates the center locations. These geometric changes separate out representations for distinct stimuli, creating more efficient encoding. We study how both types of diversity affect the population code for two different perceptual tasks: discrimination and identification. While both types of diversity improve encoding for both tasks, their distinct impacts on geometry make each more beneficial for one of the two tasks. Amplitude diversity impacts coding efficiency more for discrimination than it does for identification, while bandwidth diversity has a stronger impact on identification. These complementary effects indicate the importance of both types of diversity for perception. Finally, because tuning diversity exists across species and brain areas, our results suggest a fundamental neural coding strategy that may be applicable to a wide range of behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.