ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
High throughput machine learning pipeline to characterize larval zebrafish motor behavior.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using machine learning, we developed models that rigorously detect and classify larval zebrafish spontaneous and stimulus-evoked behaviors in various well plate formats. Zebrafish are an ideal model system for investigating the neural substrates underlying behavior due to their simple nervous system and well-documented responses to environmental stimuli. To track movement, we utilized an 8 key point pose estimation model, allowing precise capture of zebrafish kinematics. Using this kinematic data, we trained two random forest classifiers in a semi-supervised learning framework to classify various discreet behavioral outputs including stationary, scoot, turn, acoustic-startle like behavior, and visual-startle like behavior. The classifiers were trained on a manually labeled dataset, and their accuracy was validated showing high precision. To validate our machine learning models, we analyzed behavioral outputs during various stimulus evoked responses and during spontaneous behavior. For additional validation, and to show the utility of our recording and analysis pipeline, we investigated the locomotor effects of several established drugs with well-defined impacts on neurophysiology. Here we show that machine learning model development, enabled by semi-supervised learning developed classification models, provide detailed insights into the behavioral phenotypes of zebrafish, offering a powerful, high throughput method for studying neural control of behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.