Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40667123›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Cortical dissociation of spatial reference frames during place navigation.

Patrick A LaChance, Elaina R Gross, Shruthi Sankaranarayanan, Michael E Hasselmo

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick A LaChanceCenter for Systems Neuroscience and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1477-064X
Elaina R GrossCenter for Systems Neuroscience and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Shruthi SankaranarayananCenter for Systems Neuroscience and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-9231-7631
Michael E HasselmoCenter for Systems Neuroscience and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-6377

Funding

Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Coding in CortexR01MH120073 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Thalamocortical Circuits Governing Egocentric-Allocentric Spatial Reference Frame TransformationsF32MH139270 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Patrick Adam LaChance · 2024 to 2026
$234k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH139270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals rely on both sensory perception and memory when navigating relative to learned allocentric locations. Incoming sensory stimuli, which arrive from an egocentric perspective, must be integrated into an allocentric reference frame to allow neural computations that direct an animal toward a learned goal. This egocentric-allocentric spatial transformation has been proposed to involve projections from the rodent postrhinal cortex (POR), which receives strong visual input, to the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), which contains allocentric spatial cell types such as grid and border cells. A major step toward understanding this transformation is to identify how POR and MEC spatial representations differ during place navigation, which is currently unknown. To answer this question, we recorded single neurons from POR and MEC as rats engaged in a navigation task that required them to repeatedly visit a learned uncued allocentric location in an open field arena to receive a randomly scattered food reward. While neurons in both regions displayed strong tuning to the spatial structure of the environment, neither showed bias toward the goal location despite strongly biased behavior. Critically, when local visual landmarks were manipulated to place the visual scene in conflict with the learned location, POR neurons adjusted their tuning preferences to follow the visual landmarks, while MEC neurons remained in register with the true global reference frame. These findings reveal a strong dissociation between POR and MEC spatial reference frames during place navigation and raise questions regarding the mechanisms underlying integration of POR egocentric signals into the MEC allocentric spatial map.

Identifiers

PMID40667123
PMCPMC12262825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.