ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Whole-body central processing of lateral line inputs encodes flow direction relative to the center-of-mass.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
From shifting visual scenes to tactile deformations and fluid motion, animals must interpret patterns of sensory flow around their body to construct stable internal models and produce adaptive behavior. Understanding of how such transformations are encoded within the brain remains incomplete. To tackle this question, we leverage the lateral line of larval zebrafish as a tractable sensory system sensitive to fluid motion that is used to steer navigation, feed, and avoid predators. By presenting stimuli of either direction to neuromasts along the body, we used high-resolution calcium imaging to map hindbrain responses. Unexpectedly, our findings challenge the notion that central lateral line processing lacks topographic structure by revealing a simple yet powerful principle centered on a egocentric spatial framework: the direction and location of local flow motions are encoded in reference to the animal's center-of-mass. This simple representation enables the brain to register complex flow patterns and provides a robust basis for subsequent behavioral action selection. MON neurons that encode flow toward the center-of-mass broadly project to form bilateral connections onto reticulospinal neurons that coordinate forward locomotion while MON neurons that encode flow away from the center-of-mass displayed a more selective and unilateral projection profile to command neurons for turns. Our discovery represents a shift from purely somatotopic encoding toward an integrative representation of axial position and directionality combined, revealing a novel principle of encoding spatio-directional cues in the hindbrain. This study advances our understanding of how complex mechanosensory inputs select appropriate motor outputs via simple egocentric neural maps in the hindbrain. Significance Statement: Spatial and directional cues are essential to select appropriate actions in response to changes in the environment. How information from broadly distributed mechanosensors across the entire body occurs in the brain enables motor selection remains elusive. By directionally stimulating each and virtually all neuromasts distributed along the lateral line of larval zebrafish, our study uncovers that spatial and directional inputs from each flow sensors is encoded in the medial octavolateralis nuclei relative to the animal's center-of-mass in order to subsequently recruit reticulospinal neurons driving forward and turn bouts. These results establish a new framework for understanding how broadly distributed inputs get integrated to recruit motor command neurons responsible for producing diverse behaviors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.