ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Practical considerations for accurate estimation of diffusion parameters from single-particle tracking in living cells.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in fluorescence microscopy have enabled high-resolution tracking of individual biomolecules in living cells. However, accurate estimation of diffusion parameters from single-particle trajectories remains challenging due to static and dynamic localization errors inherent in these measurements. While previous studies have characterized how such errors affect mean-squared displacement (MSD) analysis, practical guidelines for minimizing them during data acquisition and correcting them during analysis are still lacking. Here, we combine theoretical modeling and simulations to evaluate how exposure time and sampling rate influence the accuracy of MSD-based inference under fractional Brownian motion (FBM), a canonical model of anomalous diffusion. We demonstrate that decoupling exposure and sampling times enables escape from the error-prone regime, thus improving inference accuracy, and that incorporating an offset in nonlinear MSD fitting substantially improves the estimation of the anomalous diffusion exponent. We validate this framework using trajectories of cytoplasmic particles in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.