ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Precision Neuromodulation with Real-Time Brain Decoding for Working Memory Enhancement.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has transformed non-invasive brain therapies but faces challenges due to variability in outcomes, likely stemming from inter-individual differences in brain function. This study aimed to address this challenge by integrating personalized functional networks (PFNs) derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a neural network-based decoder to optimize stimulation in real time during a working memory (WM) task. After identification of individualized stimulation targets, participants completed a TMS/fMRI session, performing a WM task while receiving rTMS at randomized frequencies. Decoder outputs and behavioral data during this session guided selection of optimal and suboptimal stimulation frequencies. Participants then underwent six stimulation sessions (three optimal, three suboptimal) in a randomized crossover design, performing WM and control tasks. The optimal stimulation improved WM performance by the final session, with no improvement observed in the control task. Additionally, the decoder output predicted behavioral performance on the WM task, both during the TMS/fMRI and neuromodulation sessions. These findings show that neural network-guided closed-loop neuromodulation can improve TMS effectiveness, marking a step forward in personalized brain stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.