ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Wind alters plant-pollinator community structure, bee foraging rate & movements between plants.
Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model .F1000Research · 2025Article
- Wind alters plant-pollinator community structure, bee foraging rate & movements between plants.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wind is an important abiotic factor that influences an array of biological processes including animal behavior, but it is rarely considered in plant-pollinator interactions. Here, we investigate the impact of wind speed on plant-pollinator community structure under natural conditions. In our field experiment we observed threefold greater abundance of pollinators and double the species richness under low (< 0.5 m/s) versus moderate (> 2.5 m/s) wind speeds. Significant differences in plant-pollinator community structure were also observed, with Diptera most abundant under low wind conditions, and Hymenoptera predominant and Lepidoptera absent in windier conditions. Across three plant species, the foraging rates of both honey and bumble bees were 15% greater at low versus moderate wind speeds. Lastly, at greater wind speeds bees made more movements between plants, suggesting that wind may improve yield for crops that require cross-pollination. Overall, our findings show that wind is an important factor in determining which pollinator groups are active and that eusocial bees, which are often the most important pollinators, were little affected by moderate wind speeds. Our results raise several important issues for further study and suggest that the use of linear features such as trees and hedges that act as windbreaks may be beneficial to crop pollination and conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.