Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666818›Full record

ReviewArchive of clinical cases2025

The evolution of prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing: from cytogenetics to precision medicine.

Ileana Delia Săbău, Laurenţiu-Camil Bohîlţea, Valentin Varlas, Adelina Silvana Gheorghe, Maria Riza, Nicolae Suciu, Iuliana Ceauşu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archive of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ileana Delia SăbăuMedical Genetics Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Laurenţiu-Camil BohîlţeaMedical Genetics Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Valentin VarlasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filantropia Hospital", Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Adelina Silvana GheorgheDepartment of Medical Oncology I, Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu", Bucharest, Romania.
Maria RizaMedical Genetics Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Nicolae SuciuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Polizu Clinical Hospital, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Bucharest, Romania.
Iuliana CeauşuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology I, "Dr. I. Cantacuzino Hospital", Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal genetic diagnostics have undergone a remarkable transformation, progressing from early cytogenetic techniques such as karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and, most recently, whole exome sequencing (WES). WES has emerged as a groundbreaking tool, allowing for identifying single-gene mutations, small insertions and deletions, and other pathogenic variants responsible for rare and complex diseases. Unlike conventional approaches, which primarily detect large chromosomal abnormalities, WES provides a high-resolution analysis of the fetal genome, significantly improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling early intervention. This review explores the historical evolution of prenatal genetic testing, highlighting key milestones from the introduction of cytogenetics in the 1960s to the integration of WES in clinical practice over the last decade. WES has proven instrumental in diagnosing monogenic disorders, uncovering the genetic basis of fetal anomalies, and investigating cases of stillbirth and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, despite its immense clinical utility, challenges such as the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), ethical concerns surrounding incidental findings, and the financial burden associated with sequencing continue to impact its widespread adoption. Future directions in WES include its potential integration with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), advancements in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven bioinformatics, and its role in precision medicine, offering more personalized and data-driven approaches to prenatal care. As technological innovations continue to enhance the speed, accuracy, and affordability of WES, its role as a cornerstone of modern prenatal diagnostics is expected to expand, shaping the future of fetal genetic screening and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in GenomicsChromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA)Genetic DiagnosticsMonogenic DiseasesNon-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS)

Identifiers

PMID40666818
PMCPMC12262054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.