ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
A Case of Epiretinal Membrane Masquerading as Foveal Hypoplasia Uncovered by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This case report describes a patient whose misdiagnosis of foveal hypoplasia was uncovered by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) findings that suggested the presence of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) over foveal hypoplasia. Case Presentation: A 67-year-old man with no significant past medical history was referred to our retina clinic with a diagnosis of foveal hypoplasia. He had been experiencing significant vision loss for more than 1 year. OCT demonstrated absence of the foveal depression in both eyes. A subtle ERM was identified in the left eye OCT, but the presence of an ERM in the right eye OCT was equivocal. As such, it was unclear whether flattening of the fovea was attributable to hypoplasia or ERM based on OCT alone. This prompted further investigation with OCTA, which showed the presence of the FAZ in both eyes. The diagnosis of stage 2 ERM OU was made based on OCTA findings. The patient underwent cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation, pars plana vitrectomy, and ERM peel, which resulted in improvement of visual symptoms and visual acuity. Follow-up OCT showed normalization of the foveal pit in the right eye greater than the left eye. Conclusion: This case demonstrates the importance of utilization of OCTA in differentiating true foveal hypoplasia from this foveal "pseudo-hypoplasia" exhibited by our patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.