ArticleOman journal of ophthalmology
Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24-53 months.
Article in Oman journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lacrimal Intubation in the Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Prospective Comparative Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common condition in neonates, often requiring intervention when conservative treatments and simple probing fail. This study aimed to explore the efficiency and safety of endoscopic-guided bicanalicular (BC) and monocanalicular (MC) Ritleng intubation in treating CNLDO. METHODOLOGY: This multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized comparative study was conducted between 2007 and 2022. The study included a total of 90 patients aged 24-53 months who had either failed probing or presented late with CNLDO. The participants were divided into two groups: 45 treated with BC and the other 45 with MC Ritleng intubation. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1 week postoperatively, then at 1 month, and 3 months after stent removal. Finally, postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
resultsThe clinical success rates were comparable, with BC achieving 93.3% and MC achieving 92.2% (
conclusionsBoth BC and MC Ritleng intubation are effective treatments for late-presenting CNLDO and cases following failed probing. However, MC intubation stands out as a safer and quicker option, significantly reducing the risk of complications. This study emphasizes the advantages of MC Ritleng intubation for pediatric patients with CNLDO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.