Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666763›Full record

ArticleOman journal of ophthalmology

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy enhancement for myopic regression.

Turad A Alkadi, Faris Hussam Binyousef, Shahad A Alruwaili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Turad A AlkadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faris Hussam BinyousefFellowship and Residency Training Program, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad A AlruwailiFellowship and Residency Training Program, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncorrected refractive errors are a major global public health concern, responsible for approximately 50% of visual impairments. Surgical options such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser METHODOLOGY: Trans-PRK was performed in eyes with myopic regression after previous PRK or LASIK with a mean refractive spherical equivalent (SE) of - 1.92 diopter (D) ±0.96 (standard deviation). The mean preoperative logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.59 ± 0.38. Postoperative evaluation included UDVA, SE, epithelial healing, and haze formation at 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months.

resultsThe study evaluated 26 eyes of 15 patients. At 6 months postoperatively, the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D of the target refraction was 37.5% and 100%, respectively. After the enhancement, the percentage of eyes with Snellen UDVA of 20/20 or better was 80% at 6 months, while all of the eyes had a Snellen UDVA of 20/25 or better. The mean postoperative SE was - 1.01 ± 0.74, at 1 week, -0.61 ± 0.98 at 3 months, and - 0.38 ± 0.57 at 6 months. No significant complications were noted.

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that Trans-PRK appears to be safe, effective, stable, and predictable procedure for the treatment of myopic regression after previous PRK or LASIK.

Indexed as

Corneal wound healingenhancementexcimer laser ablationhazeretreatment

Identifiers

PMID40666763
PMCPMC12258836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.