ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation in dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical benefit of faecal microbiota transplantation administered via a single retention enema as an adjunctive treatment in dogs with chronic enteropathy: a randomised controlled trial.The Journal of small animal practice · 2026Article
- The Collaborative Collapse: Bile Acid Dysmetabolism as a Central Pathogenic Driver in Canine and Feline Multi-Systemic Disorders-From Mechanisms to Precision Therapeutics.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Effects and Microbiota Changes Following Oral Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Capsules in Canine with Chronic Enteropathy After Parvovirus Infection: Case Report.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients with Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis: A Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The digestive tract hosts a variety of microorganisms. These microorganisms " Objectives: The goals of this pilot study were to evaluate the safety and impact of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) for dogs suffering from non-infectious digestive disorders. Animals: Seven client-owned adult dogs with idiopathic persistent diarrhea (>3 weeks) and very poor skin-coat conditions received the intervention (FMT) and were evaluated in a private veterinary clinic. Methods: Transplants have been taken from healthy donors and were administered rectally to recipients. Objective clinical examinations with analyses of blood and feces samples on day 0 (pre-FMT) and days 14-28 (post-FMT) were performed. Besides the conventional blood hematology and biochemistry analyses, 16S Results: No FMT-related complications occurred. Five of seven (71%) patients demonstrated improved fecal parameters associated with better overall clinical outcome, whereas four of the five (80%) recovered recipients showed molecular correlation with the donor gut microbiota after rectal FMT. There were insignificant changes shown for the conventionally analyzed blood samples. The serum cobalamin levels showed a tendency to increase in recovered recipients. Conclusion: FMT was easy to apply and displayed certain health benefits in this study. Our findings reveal the important role of a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.