Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666659›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2024

Investigating the interrelationship among academic emotions, classroom engagement, and self-efficacy in the context of EFL learning in smart classrooms in China.

Yeting Hu, Chuanzhi Fang, Jinhua Wu, Lan Mi, Ping Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yeting HuFaculty of General Education and Foreign Languages, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2998-0267
Chuanzhi FangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4820-4605
Jinhua WuSchool of Computer and Software Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu, China.
Lan MiFaculty of General Education and Foreign Languages, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu, China.
Ping DaiSchool of Computer and Software Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to fill in the gap by exploring the interrelationship among academic emotions, classroom engagement and self-efficacy in EFL learning among Chinese non-English majors in smart classrooms. Methods: A total of 409 non-English majors in their first year from a Chinese university completed the revised version of the academic emotions scale, classroom engagement scale and self-efficacy scale and their interrelationship has been analysed by Structural Equation Modelling. Results: Positive emotion significantly enhances classroom engagement, while negative emotion does not. Classroom engagement has a significant effect on promoting self-efficacy, which is influenced by both positive and negative emotions, with positive emotions having a greater impact. Specifically, classroom engagement mediates the relationship between positive emotion and self-efficacy, whereas it does not mediate between negative emotion and self-efficacy. Conclusion: Smart classrooms can stimulate students' positive academic emotions, increase their engagement in learning so as to enhance their self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Academic emotionsclassroom engagementEFL learningself-efficacystructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID40666659
PMCPMC12218430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.