Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666648›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2024

The Big Five and dark triad personality traits as predictors of emotional labour.

Emrah Özsoy, Mark D Griffiths, Zeynep Ak Şahinoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emrah ÖzsoySakarya Business School, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2886-8824
Mark D GriffithsInternational Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-6524
Zeynep Ak ŞahinoğluGraduate School of Business, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-4604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Emotional labour is expected, especially from service sector employees, to ensure customer satisfaction and meet corporate expectations. Previous studies have mainly focused on the effects of emotional labour on employees. Few studies have examined its predictors in terms of personality traits. In the present study, the predictive levels of the Big Five and dark triad traits on emotional labour were examined possibly for the first time. Method: Four hundred and seventy-three service sector employees participated in the research. Data were collected using an online survey comprising questions relating to the Big Five personality traits, dark triad personality traits, emotional labour and personal (demographic) information. Descriptive statistics, internal consistency test, Pearson's correlation and hierarchical regression were used to analyse the data. Results: According to the findings, Machiavellianism was the strongest predictor of surface acting, and agreeableness was the strongest predictor of deep acting and naturally felt emotions. Narcissism was found to be a predictor of surface acting. Conclusions: As a result of examining the Big Five and dark triad traits in predicting emotional labour styles, the fact that agreeableness predicted deep acting and naturally felt emotions suggests that agreeableness should be given closer attention in recruitment and promotion decisions, especially in the service sector.

Indexed as

Big FiveEmotional labourMachiavellianismnarcissismpsychopathy

Identifiers

PMID40666648
PMCPMC12218565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.