ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2024
A qualitative study investigating users' perspective of bariatric surgery online health communities in facilitating social support.
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Qualitative and Quantitative Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes From an 8-year Follow-Up After Gastric Bypass Surgery in People With Type 2 Diabetes.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To fulfil a need for greater access to social support postoperatively, adults who have undergone bariatric surgery have turned to Online Health Communities (OHCs). Prior research has signposted the potential "functional" dimensions of social support found via OHCs. However, the "structural" dimensions experienced on OHC have yet to be explored. This study aimed to explore users' experience of the "functional" and "structural" dimensions of social support facilitated within bariatric surgery OHCs. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 adults who were waitlisted or had undergone bariatric surgery. Data were analysed with both deductive and inductive methodologies utilised. Deductive analysis was mapped to social support theories thus themes reflect "informational", "emotional", "belonging", and "tangible" social support. Results: There were five subthemes generated under the theme of "informational" social support, two under "emotional" and "tangible" social support, and one under "belonging" social support. Participants believed that the "informal" structural support in their life was insufficient and a contributing factor to turning to OHCs. For some participants, "formal" structural social support was facilitated via OHCs; however, most were seeking different types of support than what they can receive from their medical support team. The inductive analysis generated two themes including "access to reliable social support 24/7" and "satisfied with the support available on OHCs", highlighting key advantages and value of OHCs. Conclusions: There seems to be value for OHCs in bariatric surgery for social support. However, fundamentally the shared experiences and "belonging" social support seem to be a linchpin for the success of OHCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.