Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666640›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2024

Psychological testing in the profession of psychology: an Australian study.

Peter Macqueen, Jo-Anne M Abbott, Nigar G Khawaja, Rebecca Mathews, Douglas Scott, Bruce D Watt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter MacqueenCompass Consulting, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2897-0956
Jo-Anne M AbbottAustralian Psychological Society, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-8417
Nigar G KhawajaQueensland University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-9833
Rebecca MathewsAustralian College of Applied Professions, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0940-923X
Douglas ScottMonash University, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5873-0296
Bruce D WattBond University, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8777-3150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In Australia, psychological measurement and testing is a core competency for all registered psychologists. This study aimed to provide a current perspective on the views of Australian psychologists in the use of psychological testing given the lack of recent Australian research. Method: Psychologists ( Results: Attitudinal differences, based on demographics and practice endorsement area, were examined. Partial support was obtained for the factorial model of previous EFPA studies. There was no difference in attitudes based upon the gender of the psychologists, but older psychologists reported less favourable attitudes and lower competence for psychological testing. Psychologists holding endorsements in organisational psychology, neuropsychology, and educational and developmental psychology indicated more positive testing attitudes and appreciation than other areas of practice. The application of technology in assessment was identified as an area that warrants further investigation and training. Conclusions: The outcome has theoretical and practical implications for professional bodies and educational institutions that develop policies and training programs relevant to psychological measurement and testing.

Indexed as

Area of practice endorsementAustraliapsychologiststesting attitudestesting surveytraining

Identifiers

PMID40666640
PMCPMC12218523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.