ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2024
Adolescent and young adult sleep and sleep-related behaviour change before and during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Canada.
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep disturbance is common in adolescents and young adults (AYAs), impacted by stress and academic/scheduling demands that conflict with biological phase delay. COVID-19 lockdowns allowed us to study sleep in AYAs when there are lessened scheduling demands. Additionally, we could test whether a sleep self-management app was helpful during lockdowns. Method: AYAs (ages 15-24 years) before (Pre-Lockdown; Results: The Lockdown group reported later and less variable rise times (RT) and spent more time in bed (TIB), both awake and asleep. Pre-Lockdown set a goal to reduce RT variability whereas Lockdown set a goal to decrease TIB, and AYAs made behaviour changes to meet their goals. For both groups, sleep onset, duration of awakenings, sleep duration and efficiency, and insomnia severity significantly improved at endpoint. Conclusions: AYAs slept differently during lockdowns, perhaps due to decreased scheduling. The pandemic revealed the need for accessible strategies to improve sleep health. Findings support the feasibility of using evidence-based apps, and that AYAs can effectively use self-management tools across variable global and social contexts to improve their sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.